This week, Metro School Board member Will Pinkston authored
a thoughtful opinion piecein
the City Paper, in which he asked
Nashvillians to agree on three points: charter schools are a valuable part of
Nashville’s public school offerings; Metro Schools are, in fact, now improving
on year-over-year test results; and that the ongoing feud between the Metro
School Board and state policymakers over charter school policy is taking a toll
on our community. The goal is to “rightsize,” or reset, the education
conversation in our city, so that we are working productively toward the goal
of delivering an outstanding education to every child in our city.
At the Nashville Area Chamber, we generally agree
with Mr. Pinkston’s assessment. Like many Nashvillians, we have become
increasingly frustrated by the total inability of all parties to move beyond a
dispute around a single charter school application. There is much more
important work to be done to improve the education of the tens of thousands of
students currently attending taxpayer-funded schools across our city. But if we
can agree that Pinkston’s three points are valid, let’s also agree on a “to-do
list”-- tangible steps that need to be taken in each of these areas if we are
going to create a productive education conversation in our city for the long
term.
1) There appears to be consensus that high-quality
charter schools are positive additions to the range of school choices available
to Nashville families. But how many charter schools does Nashville need and
where should they be located? What types of programmatic features should they
offer? What kind of student needs should they serve? A comprehensive, district strategy for charter schools, as recommended in the Chamber’s 2012 Education
Report Card, would answer those questions, but none exists. The school board is
the natural owner of such a plan, and engaging a wide range of stakeholders would
help ensure its success. Not taking the lead will result in increasing chaos or
leaving the development of such a plan to somebody else.
2) As a whole, Metro Schools has made
across-the-board progress over the past three years on the more rigorous Diploma
Project state standards. There also seems to be agreement that progress needs
to accelerate greatly if we are to give every Nashville child a high-quality public education during our lifetimes. The leadership of our school district
needs to turn its full attention to developing school improvement strategies that produce results: outstanding teachers in every classroom, school leaders
that can turn a great faculty into a great school community, and a curriculum
that engages students in their own learning. Our leaders can’t do that if they
are preoccupied with defending the system from real or perceived threats from
the outside. Metro Schools needs to focus much more on its own competitiveness
and a lot less on its future competition.
3) We had hoped that the two sides could resolve
the conflict over the Great Hearts appeal and avoid the $3.4 million sanction,
but they’ve been unable to do so, so it’s time to move on. It’s also time to
move on regarding the current legislation creating a state charter authorizer.
In its current form, HB702/SB830 creates a new state entity that will make charter appeal decisions for any
district that has one of the lowest-performing schools in the state. If this
state entity grants the appeal, then they would have the accountability for authorizing the charter, instead of the local school district.We support the
current bill because it preserves local school boards as the primary authorizer
and begins to clean up a charter appeals process that has proven to be
dysfunctional. In all likelihood, the bill will become law this year and when
it does, school boards would best spend their time and energy being operators
and authorizers of high-quality schools, rather than pursuing legal action that
could lead to their future obsolescence as charter authorizers.
We appreciate Will Pinkston’s
leadership in acknowledging that the current fight over charters isn’t helping
to improve public education in Nashville, and we will take him up on his offer
to try and “reboot” the education conversation at the April 20 meeting at Casa
Azafran. We hope other community stakeholders will do the same and that all
will make a good faith effort to work toward consensus about what is really
needed to improve our schools. And let’s take specific, productive action so
that this one meeting becomes a series of community discussions leading to
real, scalable reform.